Introduction
Peer assessment and self-assessment are much more than learners simply
marking their own or each other's work. In order to improve learning self-assessment
must engage learners with the quality of their work and help them reflect
on how to improve it. Peer assessment enables learners to provide each other
with valuable feedback so that they can learn from and support each other.
Principles
Peer assessment adds a valuable dimension to learning: the opportunity
to talk, discuss, explain and challenge each other enables learners to achieve
beyond what they can learn unaided. Peer assessment helps develop self-assessment.
Self-assessment then promotes independent learning, helping learners to
take increasing responsibility for their own progress.
In practice
Learners do not become self-evaluative overnight. The development of peer
assessment and self-assessment takes planning, time, patience and commitment.
By planning and using a range of strategies and by dedicating time to allow
learners to reflect on and discuss their learning, teachers can develop
learners' peer and self-assessment skills.
The process of developing self-assessment and peer assessment needs to
be tackled in stages. In the early stages learners need to have the process
regularly modelled for them. It is useful to have examples of work, either
from previous pupils or examples that teachers have written themselves,
that demonstrate the intended learning outcomes. The teacher can then use
these with the whole class, for example on a whiteboard, to critique the
responses and model the approach before asking them to work on each other's
or their own work. It is helpful if the teacher thinks aloud while critiquing
so that learners develop the necessary language and approach. Once the teacher
has demonstrated the process with an anonymous piece of work, the learners
can then critique each other's work.
To develop peer assessment and self-assessment the teacher will need to:
- plan peer assessment and self-assessment opportunities in lessons, for
example with 'pair and share' opportunities during class questioning
- explain the intended learning outcomes behind each task and how they
relate to the learning objectives
- provide learners with clear success criteria that help them assess the
quality of their work
- train learners over time to assess their own work and the work of others
and develop an appropriate language
- frequently and consistently encourage learners' reflection on their
learning
- guide learners to identify their next steps.
Strategies for peer assessment and self-assessment
Strategies for peer assessment and self-assessment |
Key benefit(s) |
Examples of how and where it could be used in a lesson |
1. Encourage learners to listen to others' responses to questions
and presentations made in class and to ask questions on points that
they do not understand. |
- Learners think about what they have not understood
- Learners publicly acknowledge that they can, and want to, learn
from each other
- Promotes the idea of collaborative working - 'many brains are
better than just one'
- Can help establish 'working together' protocols
|
- Whole-class discussion making conjectures about comparison of
data displayed in two pie charts. Learners respond using whiteboards
followed by episodes during which successive pupils add to or
refute explanations
- Learners research different alternative energy resources and
make short presentations to the rest of the class about how each
one works and its advantages and disadvantages. The teacher acts
as chair and takes questions from the rest of the class, feeding
them to an appropriate learner on the presentation team
|
2. Use examples of work from anonymous learners and ask their peers
to suggest possible ways of improving the work and how they would
meet the learning outcomes. |
- Learners see what success looks like and explicitly identify
the features that make for a good piece of work
- Helps moderate shared understanding of standards
- Sets benchmarks for target setting
|
- Learners are given some solutions to a problem and asked to
evaluate the efficiency of the strategies chosen, to identify
errors and make suggestions for improvement
- Learners are given some background from a particular scientific
enquiry and a set of results. Before writing their conclusions,
learners are shown examples written by other pupils and discuss
which is the better conclusion and why
- The teacher models a piece of work that is not perfect but is
about the standard that learners might achieve. Learners work
in groups, using the criteria to agree the level of the piece
of work
|
3. Ask learners to use the expected outcome to comment on strengths
of each other's work and to identify areas for improvement. |
- Learners identify their own strengths and areas for development
- Learners are sometimes more receptive to constructive criticism
from peers than from the teacher
- Helps moderate shared understanding of standards
|
- The whole class evaluates and revises an anonymous written draft
explanation interpreting the data given in a graph or chart. Learners
then work in pairs and fours to draft, evaluate and jointly revise
similar explanations for other charts
|
4. Ask learners to mark each other's work but don't give them the
answers. Instead, ask them to find the correct answers from available
resources. |
- Helps learners distinguish between learning objectives and learning
outcomes (and how to 'come up with the goods')
- Helps pupils recognise a range of appropriate responses
- Promotes research and independent learning
|
- Learners share their conclusions to an enquiry and discuss what
might improve each other's work
|
5. Ask learners to write their own questions on a topic to match
the expected learning outcomes and, in addition, to provide answers
to others' questions. |
- Helps learners distinguish between learning objectives and learning
outcomes (and how to 'come up with the goods')
- Helps learners recognise a range of alternative appropriate
responses
|
- At the end of a topic of work, the class generates its own end
of topic test, with a mark scheme using the expected outcomes
for that topic and their own books and textbooks as a resource
|
6. Ask learners, in groups, to write five questions and, following
whole-class discussion, identify the best two from each group (to
generate 10-12 questions, eg for homework). |
- Learners gain confidence as they create their own questions
and answers
- Helps learners recognise a range of appropriate responses
|
- A 'checking progress activity' at the end of an important section
of work within a topic
|
7. Ask learners to analyse mark schemes and devise their own for
a specified task. |
- Learners are able to reflect on what the key aspects or ideas
in a unit of work or task are, and refine their own interpretations
of requirements and possible pitfalls
- Helps learners recognise a range of appropriate responses
|
- The whole class evaluates short responses to the 'explain' part
of a test question interpreting the data given in a graph or chart.
Learners judge which responses would gain the mark in the test
- The teacher sets homework and then asks the class what the success
criteria will be. Following completion, the work is peer-marked
- The teacher constructs an exemplar copy of each topic test with
model answers and shows this to learners when returning their
test papers, allowing time for learners to compare their answers
to the model ones
|
8. Ask learners to decide whether they think an answer is reasonable,
whether they can add to the answer, or whether they would have given
another answer. |
- Learners can evaluate the validity of statements and generalisations
and discuss common mistakes and misconceptions
- Helps moderate shared understanding of standards
|
- Learners discuss the validity of general statements and whether
they are sometimes, always or never true, eg multiplication
makes numbers bigger or if a square and a rectangle have the same
perimeter, the square has the greater area
- Learners are shown anonymous answers to particular test and
exam questions and asked to improve or expand on the answer given
|
9. Encourage learners to develop assessment criteria for periodic
assessment tasks. |
- Helps learners focus on what they need to produce or demonstrate
to have their achievement recognised
|
- As an extension to a starting point activity in a new topic,
having found out what learners already know the teacher could
ask them to speculate about what they might need to learn next
|
10. Ask learners for their level of confidence about a particular
piece of work. |
- Learners can identify productive areas on which to focus their
efforts and develop mastery of particular concepts and skills
|
- Learners use 'traffic light' concepts for a particular piece
of work. Green is 'happy', amber is 'not quite sure', and red
is 'very unsure'. Greens can then support ambers and reds. Many
red marks mean more in-depth teaching is required
|
Planning for a whole-school approach to developing peer assessment and
self-assessment
A whole-school approach to developing peer assessment and self-assessment
is necessary because it is hard to develop them in isolation. Peer assessment
and self-assessment require learners to take increased responsibility for
their learning and develop as independent learners. This has fundamental
implications for the learning ethos in a school.
To successfully develop peer assessment and self-assessment, teachers need
to have a clear understanding of the progression in the key concepts and
skills in a subject. They need to be able to help learners understand this
progression and help them use success criteria to judge the quality of their
work and understand what they need to do to improve it.
Learners need to develop their confidence and skills in paired and group
discussions. Teachers and teaching assistants need to be able to support
group discussion and, for example, model challenging but constructive responses.
Teachers need to develop skills in orchestrating whole-class questioning
and dialogue that causes learners to reflect on their own learning and support
each other's learning.
All of this has implications for continuing professional development and
for the development of a learning culture and climate in the school based
on collaborative working and mutual support.